2025 Retro Edition – November Week 4

What’s your call?

3NT
4♣ 4 4 4♠ 4NT
5♣ 5 5 5♠ 5NT
6♣ 6 6 6♠ 6NT
7♣ 7 7 7♠ 7NT
Pass
Click to reveal awards

Panelists
Wafik Abdou, August Boehm, Larry Cohen, Mel Colchamiro, Allan Falk, Geoff Hampson, Daniel Korbel, Mike Lawrence, Roger Lee, Jeff Meckstroth, Jill Meyers, Barry Rigal, Steve Robinson, Kerri Sanborn, Don Stack, The Sutherlins, Steve Weinstein
Taking shape

Republished from “Famous Bidding Decisions” by Terence Reese and David Bird

Most of the experts “pattern out” (complete the description of their distribution) by bidding 4.

The Sutherlins say that after 4, “partner should have a good idea what our hand looks like. We are trying for a slam with only three hearts. He may have a high spade and five or six hearts headed by the queen. If so, 6 will be a reasonable contract.”

Rigal’s explanation: “I think 4 suggests shape rather than denying a club control. Because slam might be cold facing ♠A J x and nothing else, it behooves me to make one effort.”

Stack bids 4, saying a 4♣ control bid could be confusing. “There could just as easily be a heart slam but not a spade slam. Partner should highly regard spade values. Something like:

♠A x Q 10 x x x x x x x ♣x x

would produce a good heart slam, but getting to it will be difficult.”

Sanborn, 4: “Bid where I live. I’m letting partner know that club cards are no good. Please evaluate all other cards. Who is to say that we can’t be facing the ♠A K?”

Hampson: “Pattern out and see if partner has a fit for hearts or two spade honors and a good hand.”

Falk’s 4: “Partner obviously has at least two spades. If he holds either ♠K J or ♠A J, we are on the verge of slam, so I might as well see if partner can get enthusiastic.”

Boehm: “Bidding out the pattern. We may belong in any contract from 4 or 4♠ to 6 or 6.”

Lawrence clings to 4♠. “Far too many dangers in bidding more. We might not be able to make 4♠, let alone more spades. Imagine partner with the ♣K J 10 5 4 and nothing else.”

4♠ by Lee. “Obviously we could miss a slam opposite the right hand, but I don’t want to show too much slam interest with this bad spade suit.”

Meckstroth emphatically agrees. “4♠. No way to bid slam in my opinion.”

Abdou strikes out on his own with a 4♣ cuebid. “I’ll follow with 5♠ and hopefully partner will get the correct message. 4 ‘last train’ is risky lest partner think I have no club control.”


The Zoom Room is available Tuesday through Thursday, 3:30 pm-5:30 pm (Eastern).

Getting help is easier than ever with the ACBL Zoom Chat service.
Simply click the "Join Zoom Chat" button below to be taken to our dedicated zoom room.
Once there, click the "Launch Meeting" button to start your session. To hear us and vice-versa - don't forget to "Join with computer audio."

If the Zoom Room isn't available and you need answers, you can email us at membership@acbl.org.

Join Zoom Chat